Get advice on making beer from raw ingredients (malt, hops, water and yeast)
-
orlando
- So far gone I'm on the way back again!
- Posts: 7201
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:22 pm
- Location: North Norfolk: Nearest breweries All Day Brewery, Salle. Panther, Reepham. Yetman's, Holt
Post
by orlando » Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:04 pm
Befuddler wrote:orlando wrote:explorer always crashes over it.
there's your problem.
use chrome.

I knew I would get pinged for that, but really if you want someone to read your blog I would of thought you would start by checking it in the most popular one and all its versions. or is it just mine?
I am "The Little Red Brooster"
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer
-
orlando
- So far gone I'm on the way back again!
- Posts: 7201
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:22 pm
- Location: North Norfolk: Nearest breweries All Day Brewery, Salle. Panther, Reepham. Yetman's, Holt
Post
by orlando » Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:08 pm
Befuddler wrote:super_simian wrote:ratebeer is somewhat more democratic, if skewed, and can offer some insight to the educated browser.
bottled, wearing a nice hat. sharp, rounded sofa notes at the front. touch of angular carbonation. brassicas dominate through the middle. aroma of perturbed cow. mouthfeel of tickled salmon regarding a sunset. long bitter sweet sour prickly hoppy finish.
poppycock.
Amused me anyway

However, methinks you go a little too far in making a good point (pint!)

I am "The Little Red Brooster"
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer
-
Befuddler
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2472
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 2:06 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Post
by Befuddler » Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:22 pm
orlando wrote:Befuddler wrote:orlando wrote:explorer always crashes over it.
there's your problem.
use chrome.

I knew I would get pinged for that, but really if you want someone to read your blog I would of thought you would start by checking it in the most popular one and all its versions. or is it just mine?
Web designers
hate internet explorer. Every other browser renders according to a set of well defined internet standards; explorer is the only one with its own batshit method of doing things. Literally half a web designer's time is spent mashing up their lovely code to work with explorer. A lot can't be bothered any more (or can't afford all the wasted time), and they're hoping that the broken layouts will force people into using something less manky. Be part of the solution, not part of the problem.

"There are no strong beers, only weak men"
-
orlando
- So far gone I'm on the way back again!
- Posts: 7201
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:22 pm
- Location: North Norfolk: Nearest breweries All Day Brewery, Salle. Panther, Reepham. Yetman's, Holt
Post
by orlando » Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:45 pm
I tried Chrome when it first came out and it was a dog, crashed my computer or took an age to load so I stopped using it. I take it it's perfect now is it?
I am "The Little Red Brooster"
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer
-
stitch
- Steady Drinker
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 9:46 am
- Location: Bristol
Post
by stitch » Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:58 pm
orlando wrote:I take it it's perfect now is it?
Yes. As a web site developer, I implore you to dump Internet Explorer.
A strong mild is a 5-6% malty ale with full body, low bitterness and no hop flavour. A bit like a Brown Ale really.
stitch
-
super_simian
- Piss Artist
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:11 am
Post
by super_simian » Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:10 pm
jimmiec wrote:super_simian wrote:educated browser
What ever. Most Ratebeer users can not even describe a beer properly.
Wow, are you hard of understanding or what? I said
browser not
reviewer. Sifting out the lead tongues and the hating hipsters and those who had a bad pint or bottle, and finding the honest reviews from trusted users can give you a feel for a beer you may not have tried, or be able to try. And as I pointed out, it was just a link to an example of the beer, and actually had nothing to do with the reviews posted below. And BJCP still sucks.
-
themadhippy
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:53 am
- Location: playing hooky
Post
by themadhippy » Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:16 pm
strong mild= one that makes me fall over after 6 pints
Warning: The Dutch Coffeeshops products may contain drugs. Drinks containing caffeine should be used with care and moderation
-
barney
Post
by barney » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:31 pm
Strong Mild.
Barneys guidlines
ABV 4.5- 6% abv
Dark brown, colour is derived from the use of well roasted malts or roast barley.
Rich malty aroma and flavour.
Hints of dark fruit,chocolate, coffee and/or caramel.
Light supportive bitterness at approx 0.4 ibu/gu.
-
seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by seymour » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:16 pm
barney wrote:Strong Mild.
Barneys guidlines
ABV 4.5- 6% abv
Dark brown, colour is derived from the use of well roasted malts or roast barley.
Rich malty aroma and flavour.
Hints of dark fruit,chocolate, coffee and/or caramel.
Light supportive bitterness at approx 0.4 ibu/gu.
Now we're getting somewhere. Thanks for playing!
What key attributes of your strong mild differentiate it from a brown ale?
-
barney
Post
by barney » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:54 pm
Hello Seymour,
In your brown ale you should be looking for 3.5% -5% ABV, the flavours will be predominately Caramel, with NO roastiness. The Sweetness should be emphasised with the the higher Alcohol beers being noticeably sweeter.
Colour is more likely to be light red/ brown VERY OCCASIOANALLY reaching dark brown where residual sweetness will accompany and be more than evident.
A tight head will accompany which is not always evident in a Mild, The head, IMO, can result from either torrified wheat or barley.
Bitterness can be more assertive in Higher gravity beer, but should not overtake a predominant malt base.
Its a totally different beer IMO.
-
Eric
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2919
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:18 am
- Location: Sunderland.
Post
by Eric » Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:06 am
The opposite of a strong mild is a weak mild. Something harsh is not mild. Therefore might a strong mild not be something that can be classed as neither weak or harsh?
Without patience, life becomes difficult and the sooner it's finished, the better.
-
seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by seymour » Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:25 pm
barney wrote:In your brown ale you should be looking for 3.5% -5% ABV, the flavours will be predominately Caramel, with NO roastiness. The Sweetness should be emphasised with the the higher Alcohol beers being noticeably sweeter.
Colour is more likely to be light red/ brown VERY OCCASIOANALLY reaching dark brown where residual sweetness will accompany and be more than evident.
A tight head will accompany which is not always evident in a Mild, The head, IMO, can result from either torrified wheat or barley.
Bitterness can be more assertive in Higher gravity beer, but should not overtake a predominant malt base.
Its a totally different beer IMO.
Wow, great answer. That sounds delicious. Do you have Brown Ale and/or Strong Mild recipes you'd be willing to share? Also, would you say the same yeast is equally suited to both?
-
louiscowdroy
Post
by louiscowdroy » Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:31 pm
I think its a contradiction in terms if you think about what the name was originally meant for......
Ermmm.....'Strong'......'Mild'.......Hows about what ever you like is good....lol.
Mild is mild.......as per the above everyone has nailed it on the headand quoted Google, Wiki and such.....we all know how to read......
I think the important thing here is..............................'What do YOU like' ..................and the amazing thing about our hobby is.......you can compose/create the most amazing bunch of flavours and aromas nown to man, and if you dont like it.......just throw it away and start all over again....simples.......
Louis

))
-
barney
Post
by barney » Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:45 pm
Hello Seymour,
I am currently Enjoying this Excellent Strong mild, If I do say so myself.
For 10 US gallon
8kg Fawcetts Tipple malt
700g Aromatic
600g Black malt
600g Sugar
350g Pale crystal
150g Torrified wheat
40g Willamette 90 min
20g Challenger 90 min
20g Willamette 15 min
13g challenger 15 Min
Bitterness ratio .5
Yeast used Brewlabs TV3, which I find accentuates the malt flavours nicely.
Primed for cask with Jaggery Goor unrefined sugar to 1.5 vols
good to go at three weeks.

-
seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by seymour » Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:36 pm
barney wrote:Hello Seymour,
I am currently Enjoying this Excellent Strong mild, If I do say so myself.
For 10 US gallon
8kg Fawcetts Tipple malt
700g Aromatic
600g Black malt
600g Sugar
350g Pale crystal
150g Torrified wheat
40g Willamette 90 min
20g Challenger 90 min
20g Willamette 15 min
13g challenger 15 Min
Bitterness ratio .5
Yeast used Brewlabs TV3, which I find accentuates the malt flavours nicely.
Primed for cask with Jaggery Goor unrefined sugar to 1.5 vols
good to go at three weeks.

Looks great. Straight onto my To-Brew-List. Thanks, man!