Whoops! Graph is slightly wrong, so I'll just put that right. If anyone has used it (like me!) no real issue; in fact the correction might be an issue if using the emulated brown malt as 100% of the malt bill.PeeBee wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 7:05 pm... The "bins" represent the quantities. They are relative (will calculate percentages) so use any unit you please for heights and multiply by the "factors" (x1, x1.5, x3, etc.). The "bins" are arranged such that they butt up with their neighbours and their mid-line is about on the line for their EBC. Work out amounts for each bin, and total the amount for all bins. ...
As I marked in the lower coloured malts I appear to have started reading the increments as 15EBC instead of 30. So to correct that I've squeezed up the low colour malts, shifted the peak of the curve back, and introduced Amber Malt to fill the gap, like so: Slight issue if you use the emulation as 100%: The diastatic power may not be enough to self convert? I'm working on it, but for now I'd recommend an extended mash.
Remember, "real" brown malt was abandoned because it wasn't able to produce as much extract as pale malt. Which leads to another issue: If diastatic power is found wanting and adjusted, will that mean using the emulation will result in less colour and flavour? Or will accepting some inability to convert will result in the right colour and flavour but will be murky due to unconverted starch?