Deebee's Ragnarok Porter vs. Boulevard Bully! Porter

Use this forum to arrange and post reviews of other members' brews.
Post Reply
User avatar
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6390
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA

Deebee's Ragnarok Porter vs. Boulevard Bully! Porter

Post by seymour » Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:27 pm


This review goes back to August when Deebee mailed me a bottle of his Ragnarok Porter, with which I had offered some recipe guidance based on my local Boulevard Bully! Porter. It was fun to compare an American commercial example of a classic English style with a clone brewed by an Englishman living in Norway. In any case, here are my notes from the shoot-out:


Boulevard Bully! Porter (click link for more details)
OG: 1058
FG: 1016
ABV: 6.0%
IBU: 49
Grainbill: Pale, Cara 300 Malt, Cara 120 Malt, Wheat Malt, Chocolate Malt
Hops: Magnum, Bravo, Cascade, Athanum
Yeast: American Ale

Deebee’s Ragnarok Porter (click link for more details)
OG: 1062
FG: 1013
ABV: 7.1%
IBU: 48
Grainbill: 65.1% Pale, 14.2% CaraMunich II Malt, 12.3% Wheat Malt, 5.7% Chocolate Malt, 2.7% Special B Malt
Hops: Magnum, Simcoe, Cascade, Ahtanum
Yeast: Nottingham English Ale


Both: spot-on the exact same colour, near-opaque very dark brown, reddish at the edges when held to the light, with beige foam and lace. Actually, both of these utilized live bottle-conditioning, which contributes major improvements to appearance (compared to pasteurized bottles.)
Bully: deep sudsy foam, bigger bubble size, slightly more persistent, more lace
Ragnarok: denser, spritzy tight little bubble size, not quite as long-lasting, almost no lace

: more flowery, resiny American hoppy notes, dark caramelized malt, burnt toast
Ragnarok: slightly less hops overall: bitterness, flavour, and aroma. But instead, stronger black cherry, plum, and red wine grape (presumably from the Special-B malt and more estery ale yeast)

: 100% true-to-style porter traits, mostly identical in the grand scheme of things. If not for tasting them numerous times, back and forth, comparing and contrasting, I definitely would’ve remembered them basically the same.
Bully: grittier charcoal notes, bigger emphasis on caramel and dark toasted bread, zero yeast-derived esters and phenols
Ragnarok: more of the red wine tannins again, tartness reminiscent of open-fermented, top-cropped English porter. Much more like Sam Smith’s Taddy Porter or London Black Cab Stout than a relatively neutral American knock-off. Heading into Belgian Stout territory, as if that were a thing. A more harmonious bitter/sweet balance but fewer American hoppy traits (grapefruit, pine resin, black currant), except some subtle berry fruit and ganja notes (presumably from the Simcoe, but I still would've preferred more.) Deebee's tasted more of chocolate, coffee, toffee notes...a more interesting balance of hops bitterness and roasted grain bitterness.

: the same overall perception of body and well-rounded mouthfeel, dry finish, except…
Bully: highly carbonated, so much so I had to slowly pour several times through the crazy foam
Ragnarok: lower carbonation (again, more authentically English), more noticeable alcohol (for obvious reasons, it’s a 15% increase over Bully), not in a flawed way, though, it’s still very clean and drinkable, and in fact the elevated alcohol combines with the sweet aromas to produce a perfumey effect. A more complex dark stone fruit aftertaste, for sure.

On the Ratebeer scale, I would rate them thus:
: Aroma 8 out of 10, Appearance 4 out of 5, Flavour 7 out of 10, Palate 4 out of 5, Overall 17 out of 20 = 4 out of 5
Ragnarok: Aroma 7 out of 10, Appearance 4 out of 5, Flavour 8 out of 10, Palate 5 out of 5, Overall 17 out of 20 = 4.1 out of 5

As you can see, I found Bully’s aroma slightly better, but Ragnarok’s flavour and palate slightly better. Overall, Deebee's won by a hair. I LOVE Bully! Porter, it’s one of my favourite go-to beers. Remarkably, in a side-by-side comparison, his Ragnarok Porter made Bully! seem almost one-dimensional. It was actually a great demonstration of two intepretations of porter, one American, the other more English (or even Belgian), one more hops-forward, the other more malt-forward. Perhaps next time if he were to use lots more Cascade and Ahtanum hops at flame-out, dry-hopped, or both, he would achieve the best of both worlds.

I was pretty sure from his forum postings Deebee was a great brewer, but now I've tasted the proof. So thankful he shared.


Post Reply