Anyone got a recipe for a lager, but not using lager malt?
...or do you have to use it to ensure some DMS?
lager using pale instead of lager malt???
Re: lager using pale instead of lager malt???
What about 100% pale malt, but using typical lager hops (Saaz, Hallertau etc.) and a (lot of) lager yeast? Start the fermentation indoors and then move it into the cold once the yeast has got going. It'll look like lager, taste like lager, and only you will know it has pale malt
Use something like my Munich Dunkel recipe but with entirely pale malt - you could up the hops quite a lot if you want to head towards pre-takeover Pilsener Urquell, or massively if you want Jever Pils.

Use something like my Munich Dunkel recipe but with entirely pale malt - you could up the hops quite a lot if you want to head towards pre-takeover Pilsener Urquell, or massively if you want Jever Pils.
- Aleman
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
- Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
Re: lager using pale instead of lager malt???
I don't use Pilsner malt just to get the DMS profile . . . There is just no way of being able to control the final level that it is easier to ensure that as little as possible remains . . . after all in a good pilsner the DMS level is around 30-60ppb (Just below the taste threshold)
But you can make great lager using British lager malt and even Pale malt . . . its just a bit more malty
But you can make great lager using British lager malt and even Pale malt . . . its just a bit more malty
Re: lager using pale instead of lager malt???
Sounds like a good plan - that Dunkel must be seriously malty! and I've got some research to do with those suggestionsedit1now wrote:What about 100% pale malt, but using typical lager hops (Saaz, Hallertau etc.) and a (lot of) lager yeast? Start the fermentation indoors and then move it into the cold once the yeast has got going. It'll look like lager, taste like lager, and only you will know it has pale malt![]()
Use something like my Munich Dunkel recipe but with entirely pale malt - you could up the hops quite a lot if you want to head towards pre-takeover Pilsener Urquell, or massively if you want Jever Pils.

Don't really know much about lager, but sometimes it's just right. I thought a small amount of DMS was supposed to be characteristic/desirable. I'll be happy to skip it!Chris-x1 wrote:I can't see how any vegetative smells or flavours could be desirable in a any beer. I'd just pick a lager recipe and switch out the pale/lager malt directly. I did it with Dave Lines Budweiser and (Low colour iirc) marris otter and US05. It came out like Budweiser but I drank it any way
I read somewhere that slower or delayed chilling would cause DMS pre-cursors...? Though obviously that doesn't give any control over levels. interesting to see you all agreeing that DMS is not desirable - that suits me just fine.Aleman wrote:I don't use Pilsner malt just to get the DMS profile . . . There is just no way of being able to control the final level that it is easier to ensure that as little as possible remains . . . after all in a good pilsner the DMS level is around 30-60ppb (Just below the taste threshold)
But you can make great lager using British lager malt and even Pale malt . . . its just a bit more malty
I have had bookmarked for sometime your bohemian pilsner thread Tony, I had figured that using 100% pale would be about as malty yet blonde as the mixture you employed. Obviously not as complex though.
and that Dunkel is appears to be all about malt. hmmm....
Thanks gents, i'll give it a whirl!