What I would really like to know is.... would it make a difference if I used some finnings prior to bottling? Or is it that the brewlabs Sussex 1 always has this issue?

A very interesting concept and one I never considered, although it does add another stage to the process and therefore another risk of contamination. Could you explain how you would do this so that I can do some research i.e. the type of pressure barrel etc. As I would imagine that if it has completed carbonation, then bottled, the beer would lose its carbonation? At the moment my plan was to see how well the Sussex 1 yeast performs, then repeat the exact brew, changing only the yeast to a WLP002 and see how they compare in flavour and more importantly, which one drops the best.... I think we all know the answer, but it would still be an interesting experiment.Martin G wrote:Or get a pressure barrel. Condition until happy with carbonation and clarity. Release lid and carefully syphon into bottles or spray starsan into the tap and bottle from that through a pipe (ensuring pressure released and lid cracked open). You can get pipe to fit by using different diameters and heating them to soften and shape.
It probably will. However the idea is a good one if you stop short of priming. Store in the pressure barrel until clear, remember to vent occasionally, then rack to bottling bucket with priming syrup as usual. If the beer is exceptionally clear I've found it takes a little longer than usual to carbonate because of the lower levels of yeast present. The extra bonus with this method is that beer ages quicker in bulk so you can bring on beer quicker doing this, particularly useful if you have a hoppy IPA and want it to mellow down a little before drinking.molehill wrote:Martin G wrote: I would imagine that if it has completed carbonation, then bottled, the beer would lose its carbonation?
Thanks, most of my beer goes into a cask or king keg, but I usually brew a little bit over for bottles. For bottling I have got a 10L budget keg that I bought yonks ago from the place that could not be named that I now use if I can fill, but have also used old 3l brown PET bottles with the lid cracked (can squeeze to judge how much to crack lid). As Orlando says you can prime again, I normally just go straight to bottle. The main thing I have found is to not disturb the beer by moving or trying to fill bottles under pressure (without counter pressure system). Slowly release the pressure by undoing the lid then syphon or drain without trying to get every last drop. I have tried same with temp control but I had to move the pressure vessel and it lifted sediment. I am sure the traditional way of bottling is better, but this works for me.molehill wrote:A very interesting concept and one I never considered, although it does add another stage to the process and therefore another risk of contamination. Could you explain how you would do this so that I can do some research i.e. the type of pressure barrel etc. As I would imagine that if it has completed carbonation, then bottled, the beer would lose its carbonation? At the moment my plan was to see how well the Sussex 1 yeast performs, then repeat the exact brew, changing only the yeast to a WLP002 and see how they compare in flavour and more importantly, which one drops the best.... I think we all know the answer, but it would still be an interesting experiment.Martin G wrote:Or get a pressure barrel. Condition until happy with carbonation and clarity. Release lid and carefully syphon into bottles or spray starsan innthe tap and bottle from that through a pipe (ensuring pressure released and lid cracked open). You can erent diameters and heating them to soften and shape.