
I will be using pellet hops though and tailors use leaf
1litre Yeast starter in brew fridge is stirring away at 21c

Ready to brew 1st thing tomorrow

All the the clone recipes I've seen target around 30-31 ibus, that's what the beer tastes too.Fido97 wrote:Looks like a nice ale but not much like TT landlord - way more hoppy.
I first tasted TTL about 22/23 years ago. At that time it was a very hoppy ale by the standards of the day. It was quite a revelation and a difficult to find drink even where I lived not 40 miles from the brewery.kebabman wrote:Your beer will be vastly better than the TTL that I tasted on my last three visits to Keighley.
I only managed a pint on each visit, it was unrecognisable compared with what Landlord used to taste like. I tried it in bottle relatively recently and it was just boring caramel aroma and taste. What annoys me is that people are still rating it highly on Ratebeer website and they obviously have no idea how it used to taste. Unless it has returned to form recently, Taylors have destroyed what used to be a fantastic beer.
What you have to remember is the ingredients will slightly differ from year to year, for example the oils and such in the 2012 crop of hops might be higher than the oils in the 2013 crop.kebabman wrote:Your beer will be vastly better than the TTL that I tasted on my last three visits to Keighley.
I only managed a pint on each visit, it was unrecognisable compared with what Landlord used to taste like. I tried it in bottle relatively recently and it was just boring caramel aroma and taste. What annoys me is that people are still rating it highly on Ratebeer website and they obviously have no idea how it used to taste. Unless it has returned to form recently, Taylors have destroyed what used to be a fantastic beer.
Good question. I can't find any definite info from the brewery itself, but here's a popular American clone recipe version: Northern Brewer Innkeepermicmacmoc wrote:Recently returned to TTL, I don't reckon the bottled stuff has changed much. Are they still using styrians or is it now 'bobek' ?...
I think an "elephant in the room" no one likes to talk about is their use of kettle sugars. A lot of clone attempts are 100% Golden Promise pale malt, but in reality, Timothy Taylor almost certainly uses simple sugars for well more than 10% of the overall fermentables. If the quantity or quality of that one sizeable ingredient changes, discerning drinkers will definitely notice, even if everything else remains the same.kebabman wrote:...It is one of the few beers that I think I have the taste of locked into my tongue/brain! The yeast and styrian goldings are the key, I know that styrians are now really three hops but may be the yeast has changed?
Good to know. The Wyeast is definitely a single-strain, so at best only one of the Timothy Taylor strains which would perform slightly differently. They erred similarly with Adnams and Ringwood too, so I'm not surprised.kebabman wrote:I know for a fact that Taylor's yeast is/was a multi strain yeast so that the yeast from Wyeast can never truly be Taylor's yeast as I doubt that it will be multi strain or never in the correct balance.