Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
What the title says, whats everyones thoughts ? are hop rockets worth the price ?
Cheers
Danny
Cheers
Danny
-
- Falling off the Barstool
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:30 pm
- Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
I've never used a hopback so I can't comment specifically on that, but my question would be are you getting the results you want with dry hopping?D4nny74 wrote:What the title says, whats everyones thoughts ? are hop rockets worth the price ?
Cheers
Danny
I'm just here for the beer.
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
Yes but just wondering whats the difference is taste /smell , have people bought one and regretted it ?
- Bunglebrewsbeer
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:51 pm
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
I've had a beer that used about 80g of mosaic in a hop rocket. It stunk of hops when o drank it. It made me want to get one so I did. To date I've not used it but am going to this week in my next brew. With about 20g of mosaic Citra and chinook in. See what happens.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
I bought one, used it once and never used it again. It's gathering dust in the brew shed. Main problems are the fact I have to buy leaf hops to use in it. If your making a small batch, it wastes about a litre of wort. And is another piece of kit to clean.
On the plus side, you can circulate hot wort through it to sterilise the hops. Your not left with hops in the fermenter. The hop aromas are more prominent, but in my opinion don't seem to last as long, for example I did a EKG pale which smelt lovely a week after bottling, a month later the aroma was completely gone.
To be honest, it's a nice looking shiny piece of kit, but it doesn't add anything that dry hopping already adds.
On the plus side, you can circulate hot wort through it to sterilise the hops. Your not left with hops in the fermenter. The hop aromas are more prominent, but in my opinion don't seem to last as long, for example I did a EKG pale which smelt lovely a week after bottling, a month later the aroma was completely gone.
To be honest, it's a nice looking shiny piece of kit, but it doesn't add anything that dry hopping already adds.
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
Would you it's the same as dry hopping same aroma and taste ?Let me know if your ever considering selling it Coffeeuk 

Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
Your question initially was about hop back vs dry hopping. The 2 are very different. A hopback is used post boil to steep hops before going to the fermenter, at least on a larger brewery scale. I find late hopping (ie at flameout) is similar to the effects that a hopback would give at homebrew level.
- Bunglebrewsbeer
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:51 pm
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping

That's my hop rocket getting an outing the other day. See what the beer turns out like soon. But smells rather good in the FV.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping


Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
I have read you can use your mash tun as a hopback, pile your hops in there and pump your wort over it
Anyone here tried that
Anyone here tried that
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
Out of interest, why does it sound risky to you?Padalac wrote:^ Sounds risky to me..
James
- Jocky
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
I'd call it suicidal. If you do it pre ferment then you've got a great chance of infecting your wort. If you do it at the end of fermentation you've got a great chance of oxidising your wort.james1988 wrote:Out of interest, why does it sound risky to you?Padalac wrote:^ Sounds risky to me..
James
Grain is crawling with lactobacillus bacteria, and there's probably a few other things along for the ride too in your average brew. It's fine because you massacre them all with a good boil after the mash, and the mash itself is held not far below pasteurisation temperatures anyway. But any tiny crevice is going to harbour some of that bacteria left over from the mash, and your fragile unfermented wort is perfect for it to multiply in.
In 40 brews I'm yet to have an infection take over a brew, so I'm pretty confident about my cleaning and sanitising regime. Despite having an all stainless steel mash tun (don't even think about doing this with a plastic one - bacteria will hide in minor scratches) I'd not be confident in cleaning well enough around things like the thermowell or bottom drain.
If I was going to repurpose my MT as a hop rocket I'd take everything off of it and boil the lot.
Ingredients: Water, Barley, Hops, Yeast, Seaweed, Blood, Sweat, The swim bladder of a sturgeon, My enemies tears, Scenes of mild peril, An otter's handbag and Riboflavin.
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
Fair answer but if the wort is at near boiling point having just been through the boiler then wouldn't the risk become significantly lower? Without dragging this wildly off topic, I currently sanitise everything I'm going to use during the brew when setting up. It occurs to me that when you add the liquor to the grain (and vice versa) that sanitising the mash tun is almost redundant as you rightly point out that the grain will be crawling with bacteria so in effect you have undone your cleaning regime.
I too have yet to have an infected brew (I'm about 30 odd AG brews in) and am going to continue sanitising as I normally would but it is something to think about.
James
I too have yet to have an infected brew (I'm about 30 odd AG brews in) and am going to continue sanitising as I normally would but it is something to think about.
James
- orlando
- So far gone I'm on the way back again!
- Posts: 7201
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:22 pm
- Location: North Norfolk: Nearest breweries All Day Brewery, Salle. Panther, Reepham. Yetman's, Holt
Re: Hopback Vs Dry Hopping
Anything hot side just needs to be clean, everything cold side as sanitised as you can make it.james1988 wrote:Fair answer but if the wort is at near boiling point having just been through the boiler then wouldn't the risk become significantly lower? Without dragging this wildly off topic, I currently sanitise everything I'm going to use during the brew when setting up. It occurs to me that when you add the liquor to the grain (and vice versa) that sanitising the mash tun is almost redundant as you rightly point out that the grain will be crawling with bacteria so in effect you have undone your cleaning regime.
I too have yet to have an infected brew (I'm about 30 odd AG brews in) and am going to continue sanitising as I normally would but it is something to think about.
James
I am "The Little Red Brooster"
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer